How Many Hollywood Celebrities Endorse and Support Donald Trump? You’d Be Amazed.

The Hollywood culture of southern California has long been perceived to be a firm bastion of the Far Left. Many conservative, moderate or centrist voices from ‘celebrity circles’ in southern Cali never make it to the airwaves, for the very same reason that Donald Trump has been painted by the Big Five Fake Media Psy Op [ ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, MSNBC ] as a deranged racist bigot, a lunatic “Hitler” figure. So today I am publishing the videos and celebrity endorsements of Donald Trump that America OUGHT to be seeing, which are being blacklisted and suppressed by the cartel’s alphabet news orgs, aka Bilderberg lap dogs. Be prepared to be amazed and delighted. I was.

In preparing this post I saw true signs of intelligent life coming out of Hollywood culture, and was relieved to find them. Just a few days earlier I had seen a horrific article published by a writer for the Huff Post which called for an “atheist president’ – endorsing known agnostic [ and former atheist until 2016, Bernie Sanders]. I refuse to link to the article. It’s idiotic trash like that piece which keeps me writing, researching and pouring my soul’s energy into the publishing of what little bits of truth in the world of media where I can find it, on this news blog and my others. In the perverse darkening climate which is now unfolding in this country and around the world, the last thing in the known universe we all need is “an atheist president” in America.  I vowed the day I saw that article to NEVER read the Huffington Post again. It won’t be a problem for me, since so little of what is published on the site reflects the true American values that the majority of the people of this nation adhere to, and have for generations.

Here are just a few of the many hundreds of Hollywood celebrities who have ‘come out of the closet’ as Donald Trump supporters in recent weeks. I’m a big movie buff and some of these folks I have watched on the Big Screen for decades. It’s some comfort to know that not EVERYONE in Hollywood worships at the feet of hidden perversity, cloaked in public image maintenance appearances which dazzle vulnerable young people, who are always looking for something or someone they can believe in. There is so little left in this nation’s swollen, festering, infected pop culture still worth believing in, that it’s easier just to tune out the Satanic noise and rejoice in the silence. Here are a few exceptions. These videos represent just a small sampling of public endorsements out of the many thousands of Hollywood celebrities, artists, musicians, theatre people, technicians, and public figures who support Trump, but choose for their own reasons to remain quiet about it.

 

 

 

Advertisements

Amy Schumer Doesn’t Steal Jokes from Other Comics, Because She Doesn’t Need To.

Amy Schumer arrives at the The 21st Annual Critics' Choice Awards at Barker Hangar in Santa Monica, Calif., on Jan. 17, 2016.

1.20.2016

Amy’s had a bit of a rough PR week just the past few days. She had to set a young Jackson Murphy straight when he tried to tweet a really NOT funny bit [ now deleted by Murphy after his live-tweeted come-uppance tweeted by Schumer ] about how he had slept with the comic, when he hadn’t. He also inferred that many other men had recently slept with Amy, in a sleazy, one-night-stand kind of way – and that’s when she had enough of it, and took to Twitter to straighten him out. Odds are this guy will never get to even stand in the near vicinity of any celebrity ever again, based on how he behaved after a brief social encounter with Amy. Don’t get out much do ya, Jackson? Duh.

“In case you missed it, 17-year-old Jackson Murphy, who runs the website Lights-Camera-Jackson, tweeted a photo of himself with Amy Schumer and joked: “Spent the night with @amyschumer. Certainly not the first guy to write that.” She responded: ‘I get it. Cause I’m a whore? Glad I took a photo with you. Hi to your dad.’ He then deleted the tweet and apologized, saying it was a failed effort to be funny. She forgave him.

The online reaction was mixed. Some praised her for calling out sexism. Others slammed her as a hypocrite. But we should all understand why Schumer responded as she did, and why so many people supported her.

As a star who speaks openly about her sex life, Schumer is bombarded daily by society’s double standard. A man who is openly sexual and has lots of sex with different partners is considered a playboy, an idol, a guy just doing what many guys do or want to do. A woman who does the same is criticized as troubled, lacking self-worth, or “slutty.” (When’s the last time anyone called a guy “slutty?”)”

Next Amy had to clear the air and answer serious allegations from three other female comedians that she sometimes steals jokes from other comics. Schumer is still responding, days later. She has even stated that she would take a lie detector test to prove she has NEVER stolen jokes from other comics.

My thoughts?  This woman’s everyday normal spoken out loud ‘stream of consciousness’ about her own life, spontaneously narrated on stage,  is so gut bustingly naturally funny that no one, anywhere, at any time, either now, or possibly ever in the future – will ever be able to compete with her as a comedian. To say that Amy is a natural at comedy would be the understatement of the year. I see no situation – ever – where she would need to stoop so low that she would steal a joke from another comic. What I do see – is that she has many very jealous enemies in the comedy community, who love to have the success that she has.

Not to MENTION that in the past two years she has written a hit TV show, received a Peabody Award for it, and written and starred in a hit movie [ See the trailer for Trainwreck movie trailer 2015 Amy Schumer if you have been living under a rock since last year ].

There is no more potent fuel for all-out jealousy than PURE TALENT. Keep on doing what you do Amy Schumer. If they are hating on you, it’s because they can’t do what you do – and they will never be able to. All the haters can do is sit on Twitter and throw eggs, poor sad little souls. Rock on, woman.

Shall I go on? WHO CARES what the teeny little haters and pop culture liars on Twitter have to say about Amy Schumer? OMG.

Tags: celebrity life, internet life, Amy Schumer, pop culture, rumor mill, twitter, comedy talent, rising stars, price of fame, peabody award, talented female comedians, Trainwreck, Inside Amy Schumer

Rock Music Chameleon and Pop Culture Shapeshifter David Bowie Dead at 69

January 11th 2016

Gone way too soon, the beloved musical genius from Great Britain, David Bowie, died last night just two days after releasing his 27th and final musical album, which became his swan song: ‘Black Star’ Bowie had privately struggled with cancer for the last 18 months, without most of the world even knowing.

“He always did what he wanted to do. And he wanted to do it his way and he wanted to do it the best way. His death was no different from his life – a work of Art,” he wrote. “He made Blackstar for us, his parting gift.” – Music producer and lifelong friend Toni Visconti

Cited:  “One thing that struck reviewers who were grappling with Blackstar, David Bowie’s final album, was how tricky it was to interpret lyrically. Kitty Empire, writing in the Observer, described it as elliptical, while the Guardian’s Alexis Petridis wrote that the album “seems to offer those attempting to unravel his lyrics a wry ‘best of luck with that’”.

What the critics didn’t know, however, was that the man behind it had been diagnosed with cancer 18 months ago, and that he knew his life was coming to an end. If this had been common knowledge, they would all no doubt have looked at Blackstar in a different light. Was David Bowie saying goodbye on it? And does it seem obvious now that he has died?

David Bowie’s music, life, fashion and films and incredibly eclectic art made a huge impact on the world for more than four decades.

“I know something is very wrong,” he begins, then sings: “The blackout hearts, the flowered news / With skull designs upon my shoes.” –  prophetic lyric from ‘Black Star’ released just two days before his death.

I was an avid David Bowie fan as a teen and had listened to his music since the early 1970s when he recorded the groundbreaking album “The Man Who Sold the World.”

The feature length documentary below [ 1 hr 30 min ] explores David Bowie’s entire life and catalog of work as a musician actor, painter and performing artist – from his childhood in Brixton London England, up to his late 50s, when he was inducted into the Rock n Roll Hall of Fame. If you’re a Bowie fan, it’s a MUST SEE film:

Tributes from all over the world are pouring in. Below are some rare photos of David from throughout his stellar career as musical genius recording artist, painter, art film star and pop culture icon.

Tags: death of David Bowie, David Bowie rock icon, Black Star, music pop icons David Bowie, David Bowie dies Jan 10th 2016

Gattaca Is Here: What Will Humanity Choose To Do?

In the brilliantly imagined sci-fi motion picture GATTACA from 1997, Ethan Hawke and his love interest Uma Thurman pursue their passion for one another and their dreams of space flight careers in a well tailored futurescape where supreme genetic modification of the human genome has rendered most diseases and flaws for upper class elites practically obsolete.

Births due to conception via natural mating have been banned and are no longer legal. The STATE has now mandated the breeding of genetically superior offspring whose life expectancy, along with all known probabilities for disease and IQ, are assessed at birth, when one drop of the babies’ blood is examined and the infant’s entire life pattern is printed out as a result, including the most likely lifespan, most promising talents, career proclivities, superior athletic prowess and so on. Nothing is left to chance anymore.

“The not too distant future” foreseen in 1997 has now arrived in 2015. How will humanity choose to proceed?

We may be not more than twenty years away from this exact position in space and time for the human species, unless laws are passed NOW, in the next year, which curtail the velocity of permanently altered human genome research, until humanity as a whole can come to grips with all of the far reaching implications of taking on the Godlike powers to permanently alter our own human genomes in such a way that final and lasting changes are literally passed on to all succeeding generations of humankind, rendering a future for humanity that is changed in ways we cannot possibly imagine at this vulnerable point in space and time in 2015. We have not the talents [ YET ] to imagine the kinds of permanent outcomes for the human race in the future should we choose now to begin tinkering with designer human beings.

The first possible calamity which comes to mind – out of the infinite numbers of potential calamities which might ensue if we begin allowing this kind of science to proceed considering our prevailing worldwide cult of shared blood lust, is the tendency for a power-hungry G8 government, oh let’s say such as Putin’s Russia or the behemoth atheistic State government of China, to quickly achieve the scientific means to begin designing and breeding a designer super-soldier race of men and women whose intelligence and abilities on the field of battle are so superior to those of any other nation, that the game of war on planet earth is changed forever. The nation with the most brilliant and superior military strategists and athletes wins, hands down, and the balance of power on earth is changed forever. The genetically superior men and women of the prevailing STATE now inherit all of the poverty stricken and troubled nations of the world, with all of their “naturally bred” disease plagued inferior people, enslaving these lesser endowed populations into a more or less permanent state of servitude to the STATE of the genetically superior government, who now rules the world with an iron fist. And so forth and so on.

If you don’t think this particular scenario is either likely or possible, consider the fact that there are no less than a dozen or so existing governments in the world whose officials would leap at the chance to genetically re-order the balance of power on earth such that their own kind would come out on top, permanently, and begin breeding a super-mortal who was literally genetically predisposed to eradicate all other people and races and societies who were perceived not to believe or live in the “right manner,” as their own superior belief systems dictate? Isn’t that EXACTLY what ISIS and radical Islam is all about? Of course it is. Isn’t that exactly what fundamentalist Christianity is all about as well? Of course it is. Won’t that be just about EXACTLY why the final world war will be fought in the Mideast, with the stakes on the table being which civilization will rule humanity, the WEST or the FAR EAST? Of course it will be.

What do you think is the likelihood that a small handful of brilliant spiritually advanced and astute scientists will seize control of this new genetic  technology, and make sure it is used for “breeding out” of the human genome all earlier base inherited proclivities for war, murder, rape, pedophilia, bestiality, non-monogamous mating appetites, etc, replacing same with a superior intellect, a magnificent physique, an IQ lofty enough to enter into four digits routinely, along with a superior spiritual aptitude to grasp more advanced concepts of God, then put them into action in human society, etc – using this new technology?

Be reasonable. Look around you at our present situation. The likelihood is nill to none. You know it and I know it.

Humanity will not be spiritually mature enough to manage and direct a technology like this for at least another 100 years, possibly more. The populations of the world must first arrive at a candid and final consensus that sending off their most brilliant young men and women to fight in never-ending wars is a colossal waste of the human gene pool, and we are still more than 100 years away from that point of emerging actual spiritual adulthood for the human race. So the powder-keg discovery – like matches – must be kept away from the wild young kids of planet earth who for now, would only use it to set the house on fire, globally.

Explore YT clips and excerpts from the 1997 movie GATTACA here.

Ban Urged on Gene Editing Tools that can Create Superior Human Beings

DNA double helix

Section of human DNA

Fears the extraordinary advances in genome editing might resurrect the immoral idea of creating a new “Master Race” has prompted prominent scientists to call for a worldwide ban on a new gene editing technique that might make this nightmare scenario possible.

Scientists from the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR) have called for a worldwide moratorium on the use of a new gene editing technique called “CRISPR/Cas9” that could alter human DNA across generations. They fear the technique might be used in unsafe or unethical ways.

Nobel Laureates David Baltimore of the California Institute of Technology and Paul Berg of Stanford University and 16 other medical experts have banded together to issue a warning against CRISPR/Cas9.

The petitioners urge a worldwide moratorium on using gene editing methods to genetically engineer the human genome in a way that can be inherited.

They warned “scientists should avoid even attempting, in lax jurisdictions, germline genome modification for clinical application in humans” until the full implications “are discussed among scientific and governmental organizations”.

CRISPR/Cas9 is so scientifically simple, cheap and powerful it’s widely seen as a promising key to treating serious genetic diseases and AIDS and many cancers.

CRISPR/Cas9 is a bacteria-derived system that uses RNA molecules that recognize specific human DNA sequences. The RNAs act as guides, matching the nuclease to corresponding locations in the human genome.

CRISPR/Cas9 is the simplest genome-editing tool to work with because it relies on RNA-DNA base pairing, rather than the engineering of proteins that bind particular DNA sequences.

It’s already inspired the start of a new biotechnology industry. The technique was developed by researchers at the University of Berkeley.

The scientists demanding the ban believe CRISPR/Cas9 could also be applied to enhance human genetic traits and raises serious ethical concerns. It’s bound to reignite the debate on the morality of engineering “designer babies” and almost perfect human beings that are disease free, more intelligent and physiologically superior.

“Given the speed with which the genome engineering field is evolving, our group concluded that there is an urgent need for open discussion of the merits and risks of human genome modification by a broad cohort of scientists, clinicians, social scientists, the general public and relevant public entities and interest groups. We must ban attempts to create genetically altered humans before the technique is fully understood,” said the petitioners.

Many countries have already banned any DNA editing that can be passed from one generation to the next. The United States has regulations that hold back such developments from being realized for years or decades.

Laws in some nations, however, could allow for the creation of ‘designer babies’ in the near future, driving the authors to call for a moratorium on research from scientists.

“You could exert control over human heredity with this technique, and that is why we are raising the issue. Some countries have poor regulation or none at all. The proposed ban was designed to keep people from doing anything crazy,” added Baltimore.

The report calling the ban was published in the journal, Science.

Another group of scientists also called for a ban on the technique in the journal, Nature.

This group said “genome editing in human embryos using current technologies could have unpredictable effects on future generations. This makes it dangerous and ethically unacceptable. Such research could be exploited for non-therapeutic modifications. We are concerned that a public outcry about such an ethical breach could hinder a promising area of therapeutic development, namely making genetic changes that cannot be inherited.”

This group is led by Edward Lanphier, chairman of the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine in Washington, DC, and also consists of Fyodor Urnov, Sarah Ehlen Haecker, Michael Werner and Joanna Smolenski.

Thy further argue that at “this early stage, scientists should agree not to modify the DNA of human reproductive cells. Should a truly compelling case ever arise for the therapeutic benefit of germ­line modification, we encourage an open discussion around the appropriate course of action”.